Above a nest full of fossilized dinosaur babies has been discovered in Mongolia. The approximately 75-million-year-old nest shows 15 juvenile members of Protoceratops andrewsi a relative of Tricerato.
Next Embryos from the world's earliest nesting site. The fossil was discovered in the Golden Gate Highlands National Park, in South Africa. The sharpest look yet at the oldest known dinosaur embryos. In 1978, James Kitching discovered two dinosaur embryos in Golden Gate Highlands National Park, South Africa. Scientists uncovered clutches of fossilized eggs at the site in the Golden Gate Highlands national park, South Africa, some still with embryos – and tiny dinosaur footprints. The nests belonged to Massospondylus, a six-meter (20ft) ancestor of long-necked “sauropod” dinosaurs that lived 190m years ago. The process seems that it didn’t take a long time as the embryo didn’t rotten. “The footprints range in size. Some are so tiny, they had to have been hatchlings, Others are twice that size, but not the size of adults “ “It shows that hatchlings were doubling in size before moving away from the nesting area.” says Dr Adam Yates, who was at the Bernard Price Institute (BPI) for Palae-ontological Research at Wits University. It is believed that the nests, believes Yates, were close to a water source. That same water source, a river perhaps, flooded the site and preserved it. But when using some logic we discover that this hypothesis must be just an illusion. If there was such a flood the nest should have been washed away and the nest should have been scrambled. Thats a prove that the petrificatin happened instantly and fast and not due to flooding. At least 10 nests have been discovered in the Golden Gate National Park, and each had up to 34 eggs packed in tight clusters. The distribution of the nests suggest to the scientists that the dinosaurs returned to the site over periods of time, and that they might have assembled in groups, to lay their eggs. They also believe the fragile eggs were laid in carefully constructed nests. A flood wouldn’t leave the nests so untouched.
https://www.iol.co.za/news/sa-scientists-find-dino-nursery-1218907
The hand print of a baby dinosaur from the nesting site.
A nest of dinosaur eggs from the South African nesting site.
Infant Dinosaurs Discovered Crowded in Nest, The dinosaur is named Protoceratops andrewsi, a sheep-size herbivore that lived about 70 million years ago that's known for the frill at the back of its head. Within the nest were infants about 4 to 6 inches (10 to 15 centimeters) long and probably no more than a year old. Here it is said that the dinosaur infants may have been overrun by migrating dunes during a sandstorm. Back when the dinosaurs lived, some 70 million years ago, the area would've been a windblown dune field, where dunes may have reached as tall as 80 feet (24 meters). "The evidence suggests they may have been overrun by migrating dunes during a sandstorm," researcher David Fastovsky, a vertebrate paleontologist at the University of Rhode Island, told LiveScience. That’s another confused hypothesis because if it was a sand storm or a moving dune they wouldn’t stick together they would at least try to run away, as we know that sand dunes are moving very slow.
https://www.livescience.com/17076-infant-dinosaurs-nest-discovered.html
Mummified Poop Reveals Ancient Sloth Ate Mormon Tea and Saltbush.
An extinct giant sloth once used a spacious cave not just as a shelter but also as a massive toilet, leaving droppings on the cave floor. Now, scientists have analyzed the sloth's mummified dung and determined what plants the greyhound-size beast ate most frequently, according to new research.
Chemical analyses of the fossilized poop, known as coprolites, revealed that the ancient sloths primarily chowed down on an orange-flowered perennial shrub known as desert globemallow (Sphaeralcea ambigua), a shrub called Mormon tea (Ephedra) and a drought-tolerant plant known as saltbush (Atriplex), said Ryan Haupt, who is leading the investigation while completing his doctorate in the Department of Geology and Geophysics at the University of Wyoming.
Another clear evidence that contradicts the mineralization theory. There are no petrified or mineralized fossils of mammals because the petrification is directly connected to the extinction of the dinosaurs.
Source: https://www.livescience.com/56703-mummified-poop-reveals-extinct-sloth-diet.html
In the spring of 2017, as the EHT team was gathering some of the data that would result in the epic imagery, nearly 20 other powerful telescopes on the ground and in space were studying the M87 black hole as well. A new study describes this huge and powerful data set, which contains observations across a wide range of wavelengths gathered by NASA's Hubble Space Telescope, Chandra X-ray Observatory, the Neil Gehrels Swift Observatory, the Nuclear Spectroscopic Telescope Array (NuSTAR) and Fermi Gamma-ray Space Telescope, as well as a number of other scopes. Jets, or beams of radiation and fast-moving particles have been observed rocketing outward from M87's black hole. This observation is an evidence that the Schwarzschild radius theory could be wrong as the mass can't be compressed that contradicts the laws of physics as the internal force inside the atom wouldn't allow it, there will be a nuclear fusion and energy. But when the star collapses two different things happen: a gravitational wave due to the vacuum happened and the emission of the remaining gasses of the collapsed star escaping the black hole from the center of the black hole making a 90 degrees angle. As we see here that the matter is escaping and not been compressed. And here we see clearly that the matter is escaping the center of the black hole in the form of jets and not being trapped forming high density matter that doesn't exist in reality.
Source: https://www.space.com/m87-supermassive-black-hole-observing-campaign?utm_medium=social&utm_source=facebook.com&utm_content=space.com&utm_campaign=socialflow&fbclid=IwAR3B_J79lV_AO8tbkyMtLhrP5FxU2hNksY95i-wYJ2g-amL9AqfueUFjlT0
This study could be an evidence that supports my hypothesis about the petrification of the dinosaurs and if they really existed on earth questioning the mainstream theory about the petrification of the dinosaurs and it’s dating. But the big question is: is the main stream science censoring new studies and hypothesis?
Researchers have found a reason for the puzzling survival of soft tissue and DNA fragments in dinosaur bones - the bones are younger than anyone ever guessed. Carbon-14 (C-14) dating of multiple samples of bone from 8 dinosaurs found in Texas, Alaska, Colorado, and Montana revealed that they are only 22,000 to 39,000 years old.
Members of the Paleochronology group presented their findings at the 2012 Western Pacific Geophysics Meeting in Singapore, August 13-17, a conference of the American Geophysical Union (AGU) and the Asia Oceania Geosciences Society (AOGS).
Since dinosaurs are thought to be over 65 million years old, the news is stunning - and more than some could tolerate. After the AOGS-AGU conference in Singapore, the abstract was removed from the conference website by two chairmen because they could not accept the findings. Unwilling to challenge the data openly, they erased the report from public view without a word to the authors. When the authors inquired, they received this letter:
Source: https://www.newgeology.us/presentation48.html
Is the mass extinction and the Chicxulub theory misleading? Many studies using new technologies show a perfect state of preservation in a way that the cells, soft tissues and blood cells are so preserved as if they are still alive. that the scientists can even see that the cause of death was trauma and asphyxiation. But the scientists are hijacked by the mainstream extinction theory and came to the conclusion that they must have been caught in a flood and suffocated then buried and preserved. But this study proves that the preservation theory is totally wrong. The so called mineralization theory that takes a long time couldn’t be the case with dinosaur fossils because what we see in the microscopic images show that the preservation couldn’t have happen after a long time after death but on the contrary it must have happened instantly as many of the vital signs of life should have disappeared short after death as the cells start to decompose short after death, the cells have a self destructing mechanism and wouldn’t be preserved in the way seen in the study. A group of scientist is investigating some complex issues connected to dinosaur death and the state of preservation of bone structure and cells using different advanced technology. Remarkable discoveries such as condensed chromatin in duckbill dinosaur cartilage and newly presented discoveries of dinosaur vascular veins, venule valves, and nerve fibers and even preserved soft tissue. UV Autofluorescence Microscopy of Dinosaur Bone Reveals Encapsulation of Blood Clots within Vessel Canals. Ultraviolet fluorescence (UVFL) study of Triceratops horn, rib, vertebra, and frill thin sections shows extensive clotting in most vessel canals, probably as a result of asphyxia though to happen while drowning. While preservation methods for dinosaur soft tissues (dst) involve the degradation of sugars into glycation end products and the employment of highly oxidative hydroxyl radicals to “fix” tissues no hydroxyl radical infiltration into the lacuna-canalicular network was found. And even the autolytic destruction of cells and intracellular contents may begin within seconds after death. This means that the petrification process happened very fast after death before hydroxyl radical did occur. This contradicts the mainstream mineralization theory which assumes that the process took a long time. When this theory occurred there wasn’t any ability to observe what can be seen today and they wouldn’t be able to explain such a status of preservation. Under new microscopy the specimens look as if they were still alive. Dinosaur remains, especially fossil bone, continue to reveal exceptionally preserved dinosaur soft tissues (dST) including endogenous osteocytes, chondrocytes, intact vessels, collagen, and other soft tissues that have been widely reported from dinosaur compact bone fossils. Recently, condensed chromatin within chondrocyte nuclei undergoing chondroptosis-mimicking cellular metaphase was reported from duckbill dinosaur fossil material recovered in the late 1980s at the Two Medicine Formation in Montana and other dinosaurs from other places.
Using transmission electron microscopy (TEM) soft tissue structures; venous valves, veins, and nerve fibers, from Triceratops horridus bone and even valve leaflets have been found. Normally after death within hours blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids and other soft cells but no damage blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids (see Soft Tissue Preservation Methods below). We observed no damage was blood cells lyse, iron is freed from the hemoglobin and generates copious amounts of hydroxyl radicals, which would be expected to damage ultrathin valve cuspids and other soft cells but no such damage was observed. Nerves were recovered from T. horridus exhibited under birefringence in polarized light. Polarized light examination of extant vertebrate nerves reveals an undulating or zig-zagging sub-structure called “Bands of Fontana,” a feature characteristic of vertebrate nerves. These white bands are also seen in the dinosaur nerve fiber. All this is a sign that the petrification was very fast or even instant. In the case of the Triceratops horn examination, collected from the Hell Creek Formation, suggesting that Fenton reactions never occurred within the lacuno-canalicular network of the horn and thus never acted on cell membranes or filipodial extensions. Another sign that the petrification was so fast before this process even could start. In the case of Triceratops animals buried at Hell Creek, trauma and asphyxiation are suggested as the cause of death thought drowning while suffering major tissue injury in a flooding event according to the mainstream theory. The heavy clotting of the microvasculature within bones suggest the drowning theory. The mainstream extinction and petrification theory is totally wrong. The dinosaurs must have been killed by an unknown cosmic force that led to the instant petrification of the dinosaurs that caused the death of the animals and also trees that faced the same apocalyptic catastrophe, which could be a fore driven by the impact.. The sudden petrification caused an instant failure of the organs that led to the mentioned observations including breathing. The mainstream petrification or mineralization theory don’t provide real data about the process they suggest like the timeline of the process and did it start from the outside to the inside or reversed. We don’t see that the petrification did happen in stages as we should see layers that shown a timescale and stages of the process, what we see is that the process happened at one time for the whole specimen. If the process would have started from the outside to the inside the outer layer would prevent any fluid getting through as the density wouldn’t allow that to happen. And if reversed from the inside to the outside the outside layers would suffer greater erosion which isn’t the case. Scientist should look what led to the petrification because what is observed is that the fluids or water inside the bones is what have been preserved, just turned to silicate, the minerals inside the specimen didn’t come from the surrounding environment but are the minerals that are inside the fluids while living like metabolism. A cosmic force that don’t normally exist on earth must have changed the atomic structure of the water. That is possible as gem stones and diamonds have been created from gases in the lab under extreme conditions.
The source:
https://www.cambridge.org/core/journals/microscopy-today/article/uv-autofluorescence-microscopy-of-dinosaur-bone-reveals-encapsulation-of-blood-clots-within-vessel-canals/8762E671960898DAC303973A5A2A93F6
This coprolite specimen, is the largest fossilized feces found to date. Found in South Carolina, it weighs just over four pounds.
A new method could reveal just what dinosaurs and other prehistoric creatures ate. Scientists study every inch of an animal—from the tip of their nose right down to their, well, poop. ... But until now, only a limited amount could be learned from from studying fossilized feces, also known as coprolites.
Source: https://www.smithsonianmag.com/smart-news/researchers-use-particle-accelerator-look-inside-ancient-poo-180963604/
Every one knows the story of Medusa, and those who gazed upon her face just turned to stone. But did something similar happened to the dinosaur? Was this cosmic cataclysmic event the Medusa? A new study, led by materials scientist Sergio Bertazzo and paleontologist Susannah Maidment at the Imperial College London discovered soft tissue in a a claw of a therapod.
When imaging the fresh-cut surfaces with scanning and transmission electron microscopes through a mass spectrometer, what appeared to be red blood cells and collagen fibers. They tried to get the weight of the component molecules. The weights came back as identical to those of the three most common amino acids in collagen which proved the existence of collagen, they even discovered that the fossil’s blood cells had nuclei. more discoveries have been made, Bertazzo was examining another fossil fragment, a piece of rib from some unidentified dinosaur, which had been sliced in two inside the microscope. He spotted bands of fibres, which further tests found to contain amino acids known that make up collagen, the protein-based material that forms the basis for skin and other soft tissues.
The imageabove: (a) Amorphous carbon-rich material (red) surrounded by dense material (green). Scale bar, 5 μm. (b) Erythrocyte-like structures composed of carbon surrounded by cement. Scale bar, 1 μm. For comparison, fixed blood from an emu (Dromaius) is shown in Supplementary Fig. 2c, d. Fibrous structures. Scale bar, 5 μm in (c) and 1 μm in (d).
It’s not the first time to find Intact soft tissue in dinosaur fossils before, most famously by Mary Schweitzer at North Carolina State University, who in 2005 found flexible, transparent collagen in the fossilised leg of a Tyrannosaurus Rex specimen.
But again this raises the question about the environmental conditions are needed for their preservation. This degree of preservation contradicts the main stream theory that the preservation is a result of being buried in soil for millions of years as these components would decay after a short time. Back to my hypothesis that this preservation could only happen in a very short time, a matter of nano seconds due to a cosmic event and not a common activity that normally happens on earth, it’s the same event that led to the extinction. We notice that this kind of preservation is a pattern just in the species that belong to the dinosaur world.
Read: https://www.discovermagazine.com/planet-earth/75-million-year-old-blood-cells-discovered-in-dinosaur-bones
https://www.slashgear.com/scientists-break-dinosaur-bones-find-red-blood-cells-09387548/
https://www.wsj.com/video/scientists-may-have-found-dinosaur-blood-cells/2D6CB138-9ADA-4527-9760-1968294BFECA.html
“As the sun bore down on Garfield County, Montana, in the summer of 2006, a fossil hunter named Clayton Phipps made the find of his life. Phipps and his team were surveying a Montana ranch owned by Lige and Mary Ann Murray when Phipps’s cousin Chad O’Connor found a trail of bone bits that led to a Triceratops pelvis eroding out of the hillside. Months of off-and-on digging eventually revealed that the chocolate-brown fossil consisted of a largely complete Triceratops—as well as a neighboring tyrannosaur. For more than a decade, paleontologists have speculated about this fossil that preserves skeletons of two of the world’s most famous dinosaurs, Tyrannosaurus rex and Triceratops. Not only are the bones arranged as they once were in life, but the dinosaurs are practically intertwined.
Each specimen is among the best of its kind ever found. Together, the pair—nicknamed the “Dueling Dinosaurs”—present a paleontological mystery: Did the beasts just happen to be entombed together by chance, perhaps as carcasses caught on the same river sandbar? Or had they been locked in mortal combat? Nobody has been able to study the fossil to find out. Other fossils have captured both predator and prey before. In 1971, Polish and Mongolian paleontologists found a fighting Velociraptor and Protoceratops, an early cousin of Triceratops, that had been buried after a sand dune collapsed.” This is another evidence that the petrification of such species happened instantly while while living and is directly connected to the extinction. A cosmic event caused that extinction, weather the species lived on our planet or these are remnants of a destroyed planet by this cosmic event where these species lived. Such a preservation cant”t happen when being caught in a flood as the flood would separate the two creatures and the same in the case of collapsing sand dune. Source: https://www.nationalgeographic.com/science/2020/11/dueling-dinosaurs-fossil-finally-set-to-reveal-secrets/?cmpid=org=ngp::mc=social::src=facebook::cmp=editorial::add=fb20201117science-duelingdinosfossil::rid=&sf240076990=1&fbclid=IwAR1zAH6ZFSieO7Lbi0Q0f5cNUw8tn2Dqa-b892niVp0Bb99EhqPK-Ieqs2o Read more my other posts about the subject.
Kola the Super deep Borehole in Murmansk, Russia. The deepest hole drilled ever. The main stream geology is convinced that both granite and basalt are of volcanic origin, granite is a slow cooling form of magma and basalt is the fast cooling form. But my hypothesis is that the two are not related and granite actually is an extraterrestrial rock. Here you have a story that proves that hypothesis. It’s about the the Kola borehole allowed a direct look at the structure of the crust and put geologist’s theories to the test.
One of the most surprising findings was the absence of the transition from granite to basalt, which scientists had long expected to exist between three and six kilometers below the surface. Known to geologists as the “Conrad discontinuity,” this transition in rock type was reasoned to exist due to the results of seismic-reflection surveys.
Though the discontinuity has been detected beneath all of the continents, the drill at Kola never encountered the proposed layer of basalt. Instead, the granitic rock was found to extend beyond the twelve kilometer point. But the most intriguing discovery made by the Kola borehole researchers is undoubtedly the detection of biological activity in rocks more than two billion years old. The clearest evidence of life came in the form of microscopic fossils encased in organic compounds that remained surprisingly intact despite the extreme pressures and temperatures of the surrounding rock. Which means that the granite is much younger and isn’t part of the earth crust and just hit the area and came after the formation of the original earth crust. What they found beneath was a metamorphic change in the rock (i.e. from intense heat and pressure), and not a change in rock type as they had previously anticipated.
Interesting is the metamorphic rock found beneath as it was formed as a result of the impact of the granite body.
“ Metamorphic rocks arise from the transformation of existing rock types, in a process called metamorphism, which means "change in form".[1] The original rock (protolith) is subjected to heat (temperatures greater than 150 to 200 °C) and pressure (100 megapascals (1,000 bar) or more), causing profound physical or chemical change. The protolith may be a sedimentary, igneous, or existing metamorphic rock.“
Source: https://www.atlasobscura.com/places/kola-superdeep-borehole
https://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Metamorphic_rock
The Schwarzschild radius theory could be wrong as the mass can't be compressed that contradicts the laws of physics as the internal force inside the atom wouldn't allow it, there will be a nuclear fusion and energy. But when the star collapses two different things happen: a gravitational wave pulling the surrounding matter due to the vacuum happened and at the same time the emission of the remaining gasses from the collapsed star escaping from the center of the black hole making a 90 degrees angle in the form of a jet. And here we see the matter ejected from the center and don’t form a high density sphere as the Schwarzschild theory imagine, there is no matter left in the center. Source: https://www.space.com/baby-black-holes-misbehaving-experts-perplexed
There is evidence that the earth is hosting extraterrestrial rocks but the difference to my hypothesis is that I think that lots of it is much younger than predicted could be even thousands of years and not millions proven by young Iridium traces found in many parts of the earth. Why don’t we find enough craters on earth like on moon although our earth has a stronger pulling power?
it is because the older craters have been covered by younger once.
Here an article by the National Geographic tells a little bit about rocks that visited our planet and made changes in the earth crust;
Holdsworth and his colleagues had an inkling that the rotated layers and other curious features of the rock’s fractures might be the result of a precipitous plunge, but they needed more data to make the case. So Killingback took on the challenge for his master's thesis research.
More about this interesting story:
https://www.nationalgeographic.co.uk/science-and-technology/2020/10/in-what-is-today-scotland-before-plants-or-animals-existed-this