You may have seen the news that 2023 was the hottest year in NASA’s record, continuing a trend of warming global temperatures. But have you ever wondered what in the world that actually means and how we know?
We talked to some of our climate scientists to get clarity on what a temperature record is, what happened in 2023, and what we can expect to happen in the future… so you don’t have to!
The short answer: Human activities. The release of greenhouse gases like carbon dioxide and methane into the atmosphere trap more heat near Earth’s surface, raising global temperatures. This is responsible for the decades-long warming trend we’re living through.
But this year’s record wasn’t just because of human activities. The last few years, we’ve been experiencing the cooler phase of a natural pattern of Pacific Ocean temperatures called the El Niño Southern Oscillation (ENSO). This phase, known as La Niña, tends to cool temperatures slightly around the world. In mid-2023, we started to shift into the warmer phase, known as El Niño. The shift ENSO brought, combined with overall human-driven warming and other factors we’re continuing to study, pushed 2023 to a new record high temperature.
Almost certainly not. Although the overall trend in annual temperatures is warmer, there’s some year-to-year variation, like ENSO we mentioned above.
Think about Texas and Minnesota. On the whole, Texas is warmer than Minnesota. But some days, stormy weather could bring cooler temperatures to Texas while Minnesota is suffering through a local heat wave. On those days, the weather in Minnesota could be warmer than the weather in Texas. That doesn’t mean Minnesota is warmer than Texas overall; we’re just experiencing a little short-term variation.
Something similar happens with global annual temperatures. The globe will naturally shift back to La Niña in the next few years, bringing a slight cooling effect. Because of human carbon emissions, current La Niña years will be warmer than La Niña years were in the past, but they’ll likely still be cooler than current El Niño years.
Technically, NASA’s global temperature record starts in 1880. NASA didn’t exist back then, but temperature data were being collected by sailing ships, weather stations, and scientists in enough places around the world to reconstruct a global average temperature. We use those data and our modern techniques to calculate the average.
We start in 1880, because that’s when thermometers and other instruments became technologically advanced and widespread enough to reliably measure and calculate a global average. Today, we make those calculations based on millions of measurements taken from weather stations and Antarctic research stations on land, and ships and ocean buoys at sea. So, we can confidently say 2023 is the warmest year in the last century and a half.
However, we actually have a really good idea of what global climate looked like for tens of thousands of years before 1880, relying on other, indirect ways of measuring temperature. We can look at tree rings or cores drilled from ice sheets to reconstruct Earth’s more ancient climate. These measurements affirm that current warming on Earth is happening at an unprecedented speed.
It’s literally our job! When NASA was formed in 1958, our original charter called for “the expansion of human knowledge of phenomena in the atmosphere and space.” Our very first space missions uncovered surprises about Earth, and we’ve been using the vantage point of space to study our home planet ever since. Right now, we have a fleet of more than 20 spacecraft monitoring Earth and its systems.
Why we created our specific surface temperature record – known as GISTEMP – actually starts about 25 million miles away on the planet Venus. In the 1960s and 70s, researchers discovered that a thick atmosphere of clouds and carbon dioxide was responsible for Venus’ scorchingly hot temperatures.
Dr. James Hansen was a scientist at the Goddard Institute for Space Studies in New York, studying Venus. He realized that the greenhouse effect cooking Venus’ surface could happen on Earth, too, especially as human activities were pumping carbon dioxide into our atmosphere.
He started creating computer models to see what would happen to Earth’s climate as more carbon dioxide entered the atmosphere. As he did, he needed a way to check his models – a record of temperatures at Earth’s surface over time, to see if the planet was indeed warming along with increased atmospheric carbon. It was, and is, and NASA’s temperature record was born.
The temperature record is a global average, so not everywhere on Earth experienced record heat. Local differences in weather patterns can influence individual locations to be hotter or colder than the globe overall, but when we average it out, 2023 was the hottest year.
Just because you didn’t feel record heat this year, doesn’t mean you didn’t experience the effects of a warming climate. 2023 saw a busy Atlantic hurricane season, low Arctic sea ice, raging wildfires in Canada, heat waves in the U.S. and Australia, and more.
And these effects don’t stay in one place. For example, unusually hot and intense fires in Canada sent smoke swirling across the entire North American continent, triggering some of the worst air quality in decades in many American cities. Melting ice at Earth’s poles drives rising sea levels on coasts thousands of miles away.
Our global temperature record doesn’t actually track absolute temperatures. Instead, we track temperature anomalies, which are basically just deviations from the norm. Our baseline is an average of the temperatures from 1951-1980, and we compare how much Earth’s temperature has changed since then.
Why focus on anomalies, rather than absolutes? Let’s say you want to track if apples these days are generally larger, smaller, or the same size as they were 20 years ago. In other words, you want to track the change over time.
Apples grown in Florida are generally larger than apples grown in Alaska. Like, in real life, how Floridian temperatures are generally much higher than Alaskan temperatures. So how do you track the change in apple sizes from apples grown all over the world while still accounting for their different baseline weights?
By focusing on the difference within each area rather than the absolute weights. So in our map, the Arctic isn’t red because it’s hotter than Bermuda. It’s red because it’s gotten relatively much warmer than Bermuda has in the same time frame.
Want to learn more about climate change? Dig into the data at climate.nasa.gov.
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space!
The skies outside my house last night were Renaissance.
Han pasado cerca de ocho años desde que el Dr. Jeffrey Bradstreet, un prestigiado médico conocido por su escepticismo respecto a inmunizaciones (particularmente la vacuna MMR) y por su investigación progresiva sobre el autismo, fue encontrado muerto, flotando en un río en Carolina del Norte con una herida por arma de fuego. Su familia aún no ha obtenido respuestas.
Poco antes de su muerte, Bradstreet estuvo trabajando con una molécula altamente controversial que se da de manera natural en el cuerpo humano y se cree que es capaz de tratar y revertir el autismo.
Los investigadores afirman que GcMAF (factor activador de macrófagos derivado de la proteína Gc), que se convierte en la proteína GC después de combinarse con vitamina D en el cuerpo, es efectivo para tratar VIH, diabetes y enfermedades del hígado y los riñones. Más importantemente, expertos en GcMAF predicen que la molécula natural tiene el potencial para ser una cura universal para el cáncer.
Debido a la naturaleza controversial de la investigación de Bradstreet, así como por el hecho de que su oficina fue allanada por oficiales con la FDA (Administración de Alimentos y Fármacos) de Estados Unidos durante los días anteriores a su muerte, la familia del médico contrató a un investigador privado con la esperanza de encontrar la verdad respecto a su muerte prematura.
GcMAF en el mundo
Personas en 80 naciones han usado GcMAF. Historias sobre GcMAF no son publicadas en periódicos o difundidas por televisión, sino mediante el Internet.
La historia de GcMAF proporciona a cada teórico de conspiración sobre cáncer, toda la evidencia necesaria para convencer a otros de que hay un esfuerzo concertado para ocultar lo que parece ser una cura natural, auténtica, que puede ser extraída del plasma sanguíneo de adultos sanos. En esta era del Internet, ¿durante cuánto tiempo pueden ocultarse curas válidas a cáncer? ¿A cuántos doctores se puede balear o asesinar de otro modo (63 hasta la fecha, uno más cada semana) antes de que el público se entere?
Las células cancerígenas activan la nagalasa
Muchos doctores en medicina natural en los Estados Unidos, que se oponen a la vacunación infantil masiva para enfermedades infecciosas, también recomiendan o administran GcMAF para cáncer y otras dolencias. Más aún, algunos de estos doctores han conseguido una recuperación total en el 60 por ciento de niños autistas no-verbales y se afirmó en reportes noticiosos que se ha descubierto que las vacunas están vinculadas con una enzima, la nagalasa (α-N-acetil galactosaminidasa) que facilita la propagación de cáncer. El GcMAF reduce drásticamente los niveles de nagalasa, y trata muchas enfermedades inducidas por vacunas.”
Follow, follow the Sun / And which way the wind blows / When this day is done 🎶 Today, April 8, 2024, the last total solar eclipse until 2045 crossed North America.
Make sure to follow us on Tumblr for your regular dose of space!
Hipparis
Choosing a noun well will allow you to cut adjectives. This tightens your sentences and clarifies the meaning:
a young tree -> sapling
a single-storey house -> a bungalow
a young female horse -> a filly
her long thick hair -> her mane
a prudish person -> a prude.
his bald scalp -> his pate
an unpleasant smell -> a stench
a small child -> a toddler
a brown-haired woman -> a brunette
Of course, the choice of noun depends on context, but if you can use one word, why use two?
Writing style. If you have a lush writing style, you would use more adjectives compared to a terse one. However, more than three adjectives in a sentence will slow down the story.
─── ・ 。゚☆: *.☽ .* . ───
💎If you like my blog, buy me a coffee☕ and find me on instagram!
💎Before you ask, check out my masterpost part 1 and part 2
💎For early access to my content, become a Writing Wizard
⚠️ TEMA: MENTES ASESINAS ( PARTE 6 ) ⚠️
#criminólogoanónimo #Criminalística #Criminología #psicologia #Criminólogo #psiquiatria
For the witches and pagans who need to hear it, connecting with nature is supposed to be about like, actually observing nature over long periods of time, not doing stuff like hoarding endangered bird feathers and beach sand, or just meditating out in aesthetically-pleasing locations. Can you tell me exactly when your wildflowers and weeds start blooming? When do your bugs come out of hibernation? When do migratory birds come and go? How does the air feel during different times of year? If you can't do stuff like that, you aren't connecting with nature.